World Marathon Majors compared

The Majors are the six — now seven — races most runners build a decade around. They are not remotely equivalent as courses: the spread in total ascent between the flattest and the hilliest is larger than the spread across most of the rest of the catalogue, which is why a Berlin time and a Boston time are not the same performance. Ranked here flattest first.

The ranking

#CourseLocationMeasure
1Tokyo MarathonTokyo170 ft (50 m) of climbing
2Chicago MarathonChicago, IL230 ft (70 m) of climbing
3Berlin MarathonBerlin230 ft (70 m) of climbing
4London MarathonLondon410 ft (120 m) of climbing
5New York City MarathonNew York, NY770 ft (230 m) of climbing
6Boston MarathonBoston, MA770 ft (240 m) of climbing
7Sydney MarathonSydney, NSW970 ft (300 m) of climbing

Frequently asked questions

World Marathon Majors compared: which is number one?

Tokyo Marathon — 170 ft (50 m) of climbing. The full ranking covers 7 courses and is computed from each course's own elevation profile rather than from race organiser claims.

How are these rankings calculated?

From the elevation profile of each course, built from GPX traces and digital elevation models, clipped to the official 42.195 km. Elevation figures carry roughly ±5–10 m of DEM noise, so small differences between flat courses are measurement error rather than a meaningful gap.

Other course rankings

Browse all 32 marathon course profiles.